News & Events

Women’s Health Protection Act Reintroduced

Exactly one year after the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for the most significant reproductive rights case in decades—Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt—U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal was joined by U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin, and U.S. Representatives Judy Chu, Marcia Fudge, and Lois Frankel in introducing the Women’s Health Protection Act on March 2.

Find out more on Sen. Blumenthal’s website.

Colorado Acts for Women

2,550 Coloradans join tele-town hall to discuss reproductive rights

On August 23, 2016, Act for Women state partners NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado, Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, and the Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights (COLOR) held a tele-town hall to discuss the state of reproductive rights at the federal and state levels. Speakers included the Congressional Pro-Choice Caucus Chair Congresswoman Diana DeGette (D-CO), Andrea Ferrigno of Whole Woman’s Health, and staff from the host organizations and the Center for Reproductive Rights. More than 2,550 Coloradans joined the call to discuss the Whole Woman’s Health case, the Women’s Health Protection Act, and the EACH Woman Act.

The Supreme Court Says Abortion Care Is About Women’s Health — OK Congress, Now It’s Your Turn!

Terry O’Neill is the president of the National Organization for Women, which is a partner of the Act for Women campaign. Any views expressed regarding a candidate for elected office are her own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Act for Women Campaign, a nonpartisan entity.  

I’ve had time to digest the Supreme Court’s historic decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt and while it was a victory for women, it may be premature to call this the turning point in the struggle for abortion rights.

By striking down Texas’s infamous law HB2, which imposed admitting privileges requirements and surgical-center construction mandates on abortion clinics, the court helped expose targeted regulation of abortion provider (TRAP) laws for what they are: medically unnecessary regulations designed to be so burdensome that abortion clinics will be forced to close.

As Justice Ginsburg wrote, “In truth, complications from an abortion are both rare and rarely dangerous.”

For me, the key part of the decision is its unwavering focus on women’s health.

Read more at the Huffington Post.


Voices from Advocacy Day

On May 11 and 12, 139 advocates from around the country came together in Washington, D.C., to promote the Women’s Health Protection Act. Below, three of our attendees share their stories: a faith leader from Tennessee, an activist from Texas, and a medical student from Massachusetts.

Name: Rev. Faye London
Organization: SisterReach
Home State: Tennessee

I was ambivalent about wearing my stole as we approached the capitol. I wanted my group to be taken seriously as we entered offices to talk about the Women’s Health Protection Act. After some wrestling and at the urging of others in my group, I donned my symbol of religious leadership and marched into our first meeting uncertain what level of authority or expertise might be expected as a result of the bright red, highly visible “accessory.” As our group of advocates opened up to legislators about the needs of women and the imperative that we do what we can to stop the attacks on abortion access, the authority that I had assigned to the piece of fabric around my neck revealed itself as present in the truth and power of our little group as a unit. No, we were not all religious people, nor were we operating under any particular religious authority. We were, however, all there in one spirit. In the end, my little stole added its voice to the beautiful symphony to remind legislators that women of faith need unimpeded access to full spectrum reproductive health care including abortion just like all other women and that we’re ready to stand up and demand it. The WHPA advocacy day experience served as a reminder that as a faith leader, it is my job to lift my voice for justice.

Name: Lidiana Ramirez
Organization: Texas Latina Advocacy Network of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health
Home State: Texas

Traveling to D.C. to meet with my congressman was a powerful experience. For many Latin@s in the Rio Grande Valley, our voices are often forgotten or fall on deaf ears, especially when it comes to issues that affect our reproductive health and decisions. Organizing in our city focuses on building power and claiming our seat at the table, but the Act for Women Advocacy Day allowed us to exercise that power in a new way that resulted in real impact: Representatives Castro and Vela became cosponsors of the Women’s Health Protection Act. We look forward to continued efforts in support of both the Women’s Health Protection Act and the EACH Women Act, which would help thousands of Latin@s in Texas and across the country.

Name: Liza Brecher
Organization: Medical Students for Choice
Home State: Massachusetts

When I decided to go to medical school I never imagined that I would have to fight to ensure that I could legally practice medicine how I want to. But I will do so to ensure that women have access to full healthcare. The passion that drives Medical Students for Choice to spend our free time learning the abortion and contraception content that often gets left out of our medical curriculum is the same kind of energy that legislators need to hear from the medical community. Before participating in the advocacy day, I didn’t understand just how much sway I have as a future health care professional. In school and clinic we often see our white coats as something that can make patients anxious or fearful, but on the Hill, my white coat communicated authority that allowed me to more effectively promote the Women’s Health Protection Act. As a student at Tufts University I have more time and freedom to pursue abortion-related activism, and I am excited to continue to do so with Medical Students for Choice.

Washington Acts for Women: A Social Media Recap

On May 11 and 12, almost 150 advocates from across the country gathered in Washington, D.C., for the Act for Women Advocacy Day in support of the Women’s Health Protection Act. Thanks to all who took time out of their busy schedules to speak out for women’s access to safe, legal abortion care, both in person and on social media.

See highlights from Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram on our Storify page.

Washington Acts for Women

The following originally appeared on the Center for Reproductive Rights website.

The Center for Reproductive Rights ACT Advocacy Day, photographed in Washington DC, 11 May 2016.

“There are women languishing around the country who cannot speak for themselves. Women who’ve had services closed in their face. Poor women. College women. Hispanic women,” Texas congresswoman Sheila Jackson-Lee told an energized and diverse crowd of reproductive health advocates who gathered on Capitol Hill last week. “How dare someone say to these women, whose rights should be equal to everyone, ‘You cannot have access to health services.’”

Approximately 140 state and federal advocates, faith leaders, health practitioners, and clinic workers congregated in Washington, DC, on May 11 and 12 to advocate for the Women’s Health Protection Act. They’re all part of the Act for Women campaign, which provides unified support for this federal legislation that would prohibit states from imposing restrictions that limit women’s access to safe and legal abortion services.

The Center for Reproductive Rights ACT Advocacy Day, photographed in Washington DC, 11 May 2016.

Continue reading on the Center for Reproductive Rights website.

“Attacks on Women’s Health Will Not Be Tolerated”: Reflections on the 2016 Colorado General Assembly

The following was written by Karen Middleton (Executive Director of NARAL Pro-Choice Colorado, which is a state partner of the Act for Women campaign) and appeared in the Huffington Post.

As a former Member of the Colorado House of Representatives from Aurora, it was my distinct honor to accompany Colorado’s Speaker of the House, Dickey Lee Hullinghorst, onto the floor for the 2016 General Assembly Opening Day in January. And she made her priorities very clear in her Opening Day speech:

“Ideologues and opportunists will try to impose their views on the woman who isn’t ready to have a family. They will try to rob her of the choice to make her own private medical decisions.

We will defeat these ideologues and opportunists.”

And we did.

Read more at the Huffington Post.

Congress Must Act to Save Roe v. Wade

Nancy Kaufman, CEO of the National Council of Jewish Women (an Act for Women campaign member), recently published the following op-ed.

What if a state passes a law that shuts down all abortion clinics within 150 miles of hundreds of thousands of women because the corridors were not the same width as a hospital with 100 beds? Would that be fair? How about 250 miles? 500 miles? Where would you draw the line?

What if you had to drive 400 miles to see an abortion provider and then wait another day for the procedure — and not for any medically necessary reason? Another 2 days? Would being forced to miss two or three days of work for a procedure that takes less than an hour seem right to you? How about having to prove when you last had your period and when you last had sex to be sure the fetus was less than 20 weeks old? (And how exactly would you prove that?)

Read more at The Hill.

Save the Date: 2016 Advocacy Day to Support the Women’s Health Protection Act

Save the Date

Act for Women campaign members and other partners: Invite your staff, donors, board members, affiliates, and other key leaders with whom you work to the 2016 Advocacy Day. The event brings together advocates and health care providers from across the country to educate Congressional offices about the importance of the Women’s Health Protection Act.

The event, happening May 11 -12 in Washington, D.C., builds on the success of the 2014 Women’s Health Protection Act Advocacy Day. Experienced and first-time advocates are welcome to attend!

For More Information

For registration and travel information, including details about financial assistance, please contact

On Roe v. Wade Anniversary, Fresh Threats to Abortion Access Demand Action

Nancy Kaufman, CEO of the National Council of Jewish Women (an Act for Women campaign member), recently published the following op-ed.

Forty-three years ago this week, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Roe v. Wade protecting a woman’s right to abortion. Since the 2010 elections, a wave of state laws has aimed at restricting that right, closing clinics and harassing medical providers.

No less than 288 new laws have been passed across the country to make abortion access ever more difficult. They come with punitive regulations on clinics, impediments to those seeking abortions and nonsensical requirements on providers.


U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Abortion Access Case

On November 13, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole, a case challenging two onerous abortion restrictions. The case will determine whether Texas can shut down nearly all abortion care providers in the state, placing countless women at risk of serious harm. At issue in the lawsuit are the kind of laws that would be prohibited if the Women’s Health Protection Act is enacted.

For more than 40 years, the Supreme Court has affirmed that the Constitution protects a woman’s right to make her own decisions about her health and family. Laws like the one in Texas that is under review have been developed by politicians to sneak around the Constitution and end abortion by preventing women from accessing legal health services.

While it is essential that the Supreme Court protect our rights in this case, it is also the responsibility of Congress to enact policy that advances reproductive health and upholds these constitutional values.

The case will be heard this spring, with a decision expected in June 2016. This is a pivotal moment in our movement, and you can use the
case as a conversation starter about the need for federal policies that improve access to reproductive health care.

Learn more about the case at

No, We Haven’t Lost the ‘War on Women’

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: The war on women is over, and women lost. In the past five years, states have enacted over 230 new abortion restrictions. Planned Parenthood is under constant attack and losing ground quickly. The promise of Roe v. Wade is lost, its precedents irreparably undermined. Basically, it’s over.

Yes, it’s a familiar narrative. Safe, legal, accessible abortion is a thing of the past, and we’ll soon be forced to admit our defeat. As someone who works on reproductive rights policy, I hear this frustration frequently, from friends and acquaintances. Why is the pro-choice movement always on the defensive? Why do our allies use language that stigmatizes women who choose abortion? Why are we allowing our freedoms to be legislated away? Why aren’t we more proactive?

The answer is simple: We are fighting back.